โ›๏ธ
๐Ÿ”ฌ
๐Ÿญ
๐ŸงŠ
๐Ÿ’Ž
โ˜๏ธ
๐ŸŒŠ
๐Ÿง 
โšก
๐Ÿ“Š
Concentration
๐Ÿ”’
๐ŸŒ
CHAPTER 10

Market Structure & Concentration

Measuring dominance across the AI supply chain

HHI INDEX010K10KEUV8.1KRare Earth7.2KChips5.2KFab4.5KHBM2.8KModels1.6KCloud2500LAYER 10

Industrial organization economists measure market concentration using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) โ€” the sum of squared market shares. An HHI above 2,500 indicates a highly concentrated market; above 5,000 suggests oligopoly or near-monopoly. The AI supply chain registers some of the highest concentration levels in modern industrial history.

HHI by Supply Chain Layer
10,000
Pure Monopoly
EUV Lithography
ASML 100%
~8,100
Near-Monopoly
Rare Earth Refining
China 90%
~7,200
Dominant Firm
AI Accelerators
Nvidia 84%
~5,200
Tight Oligopoly
Advanced Fab
TSMC 71%
~4,500
Oligopoly
HBM Memory
Top 3: 100%
~2,800
Concentrating
Foundation Models
Top 3: 88%
~1,600
Oligopoly
Cloud Compute
Top 3: 63%
~2,100
Oligopoly
Submarine Cables
Top 4: 76%
Threshold: HHI > 2,500 = "Highly Concentrated" (US DOJ/FTC guidelines)

This level of concentration is historically unusual. Standard Oil at its peak controlled roughly 90% of US refining โ€” comparable to ASML's EUV monopoly or China's rare earth refining dominance. The key difference: the AI supply chain concentrates sequentially, with each chokepoint dependent on the one before it.

91%
Standard Oil (1904)
Oil refining
85%
AT&T (1974)
Telecom
100%
ASML (2025)
EUV lithography

Market structure matters for welfare. Economic theory identifies several mechanisms through which concentration can harm consumers and innovation: higher prices (market power), reduced output, diminished incentives to innovate once dominance is secure, and the ability to foreclose competition in adjacent markets through vertical integration or tying.

The AI supply chain registers some of the highest concentration levels in modern industrial history โ€” with the critical distinction that these chokepoints are serially dependent.
Market Structure Classification
Structure
Definition
AI Examples
Monopoly
Single firm, no close substitutes
ASML (EUV), Zeiss (optics)
Near-Monopoly
One firm > 70%, fringe competitors
TSMC, Nvidia, China rare earths
Tight Oligopoly
3โ€“5 firms, high barriers, strategic interaction
HBM memory, cloud compute
Loose Oligopoly
More firms, some differentiation
Foundation models (emerging)
Key Relationships
Vertical Concentration
The same firms appear across multiple layers: Google owns TPUs, cloud, models, and cables. Microsoft owns Azure, invests in OpenAI, and controls distribution.
Geographic Concentration
Taiwan (fab), Netherlands (lithography), South Korea (memory), and the US (design, cloud, models) each host irreplaceable nodes.
Temporal Concentration
First-mover advantages compound over time. CUDA's 20-year head start, TSMC's yield learning, and China's 40-year rare earth investment create path dependencies.